Skip to content

Glossary · Sales & pricing

What is Close rate?

Close rate is sold estimates divided by estimates presented. How to calculate it, the three ways shops count it, why per-tech numbers mislead, and levers.

Updated October 15, 2026 · 5 min read

Definition

Close rate is the percentage of estimates or proposals presented to customers that they buy: sold estimates ÷ estimates presented × 100. Count each proposal once, even when it holds good, better and best options, and track it separately for repair, maintenance and replacement work, because those close at very different rates.

Also called: closing rate, conversion rate, estimate close rate, sold rate

Formula

Close rate = proposals sold ÷ proposals presented × 100

Example: 45 sold of 100 presented → 45%

Measured as
Sold proposals ÷ proposals presented × 100
Unit
One proposal per visit, however many options it holds
Split by
Job type, technician or advisor, lead source
Reads with
Average ticket and options-presented rate
Public benchmark
None reliable; varies by job type

Close rate is the in-home half of the sales funnel. The office booked the call; now a technician or comfort advisor has to find the problem, price the fix and get a yes. It is also one of the easiest numbers to get wrong, because a small change in what you count can move it ten points.

Close rate in plain English

Take an electrical contractor's month (example numbers). Technicians present 100 proposals: panel upgrades, EV charger circuits, repairs. Customers approve 45. The close rate is 45%.

Now split it. Repairs: 60 presented, 39 sold, 65%. Panel upgrades and larger projects: 40 presented, 6 sold, 15%. The blended 45% hides two very different jobs. A tech who mostly ran repair calls will look like a star next to one who ran project estimates, even if the second is the better seller.

How do you calculate close rate?

Metric

Close rate

The share of proposals presented that the customer buys.

Close rate = proposals with a sold option ÷ proposals presented × 100

Where the numbers come from: Estimates or proposals in your field software, with their status (presented, sold, lost, open) and date.

Three decisions change the answer. Make them once and print them on the scorecard.

DecisionOption AOption BOur suggestion
UnitEach optionEach proposalProposal: options on one visit count once
Open estimatesCounted as not soldLeft out until decidedDecided only for coaching, plus an aged-open count
Date basisDate presentedDate soldDate presented, so late sales land in the right month

Three ways shops count close rate

 FormulaGood for
Presented basisSold ÷ all presented in the periodOwner reporting; includes estimates nobody chased
Decided basisWon ÷ (won + lost)Coaching techs on presentation skill
Rolling windowWon ÷ (won + lost) over 30 or 90 daysA sales board where big jobs take weeks to decide

None is wrong. Mixing them is. If one report says 52% and another says 41%, check the basis before you check the tech.

What is a good close rate?

There's no reliable public benchmark for trade close rates. The figures that get repeated rarely say whether they count options or proposals, whether open estimates are included, or what job types are in the mix. Build your own baseline: one quarter of data, split by job type, with the counting rules above. Then compare each tech to the shop's rate for the same job types, not to the blended number.

What moves close rate?

LeverWhy it worksHow to check
Present options every timeThe customer chooses which, not whetherOptions-presented rate per tech
Show proofPhotos of the failed part or the rusted pan make the problem realShare of proposals with photos attached
A recommended middle optionPeople facing a choice tend to favor the compromise option1Which tier sells most often
Plain-language descriptionsCustomers buy what they understandRead five proposals aloud
Follow-up on open estimatesBig decisions often take more than one conversationClose rate on followed-up vs not
Honest monthly payment framingLarge jobs are easier to say yes to as a monthly figureClose rate on proposals shown with financing

The middle-option effect comes from consumer research, not field service studies, so treat it as a reason to design your middle tier carefully rather than a guaranteed lift. We cover how to build the three tiers in good, better, best: the psychology and math.

Why per-tech close rates mislead

Two things distort a per-tech close rate more than skill does.

Sample size. A tech who presented 15 proposals last month and sold 9 is at 60%. One more sale makes it 67%; one fewer makes it 53%. That swing is noise. Use a rolling 90-day window per tech and don't discuss a rate until it rests on at least 30 or so proposals.

Call mix. Techs don't choose their calls. One who runs most of the no-heat emergencies will close more than one running tune-ups that turn up an aging system, even with identical skill. Compare each tech to the shop's close rate for the same job types and lead sources, not to the blended shop number.

When a tech's rate is outside the shop's normal range for the same work over a full quarter, that's a real coaching signal. Ride along before drawing conclusions.

  • Booking rate measures the office before the visit. A low close rate with a high booking rate usually means the visit, the pricing or the leads' quality is the issue.
  • Options-presented rate is a leading indicator: techs who present options consistently tend to post steadier close rates and higher tickets.
  • Average ticket tells you what each sale was worth. Close rate times average sold ticket gives revenue per proposal, which is the fairest single comparison between techs.

How close rate shows up in TradesWork

TradesWork reports define close rate as proposals with a sold option over proposals presented, and good, better and best options presented together count as one proposal. The good-better-best follow-up board shows close rate as won ÷ (won + lost) over 30 and 90 days, with a dash when there's no data yet. In coaching, the Pro Score scores close rate on decided proposals from 20% to 60% and shows options-presented rate as a leading indicator. Each definition is written next to the number, so you can see which basis you are reading.

Footnotes

  1. Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects, Itamar Simonson, Journal of Consumer Research 16(2), September 1989, pp. 158–174. ↩

Free download

Field Service KPI Scorecard

Track the 12 numbers that run a service business, week by week, with formulas already built in.

Get it free
  • 12 KPIs with definitions and formulas
  • 52-week tracker with trends
  • Targets and red / green flags
  • Per-technician view

Frequently asked questions

There is no reliable public benchmark. Close rate depends heavily on the work: a $300 repair on a no-heat call closes far more often than a $14,000 system replacement. Published figures usually come from coaches or vendors with unstated definitions. Track your own rate by job type for a quarter and set targets against that baseline.

Sources

Last reviewed October 15, 2026. Third-party sources are marked; some are written by competing vendors.

  1. 1.Simonson, Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects, Journal of Consumer Research 16(2), 1989

Ready to run a tighter shop?

Try the TradesWork AI plan free for 14 days. Bring your customers and price book, or start fresh with a price book made for your trade.

  • No credit card
  • No contract
  • Cancel any time
Three workers in coveralls unloading equipment from a van